PLZ-Gebiet 0. Schweitzer Fachinformationen Dresden Schweizer Str. 3b Dresden, Herr Thomas Weiser [email protected] Haufe Discovery. Schweitzer Fachinformationen ist Spezialist für Fachliteratur aus den Bereichen Kundenservice von vsvsvslive.com E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Rechtsanwältin Pia Löffler (Wirtschaftsjur Univ. Bayreuth) berät seit Kanzleien jeder Größe in Marketingfragen.
Schweitzer FachinformationenFachbuchhandlung für Recht-Steuern-Wirtschaft und Library Supplier mit Filialen in Berlin und Potsdam. Berlin + Potsdam. vsvsvslive.com [email protected] Rechtsanwältin Pia Löffler (Wirtschaftsjur Univ. Bayreuth) berät seit Kanzleien jeder Größe in Marketingfragen. Elektronische Medien: Online-Datenbanken, E-Books und E-Journals. Schweitzer Fachinformationen ist Vorreiter in Sachen elektronische Literatur. Unsere.
Schweitzer Online De Flat Sheets VideoSchweitzer Fachinformationen, wegweisend bei Wissen - für Unternehmen
No middle-men to get in the way of our vision. Click on the video for insights into what makes Schweitzer so important to living a good life well!
Is there something you like or don't like about Schweitzer Linen? Do you have any particular need that the website does't address yet?
Is there a feature missing you'd find helpful? No matter how big or small it is, let us know about it.
Is there something you like or don't like about Schweitzer Linen? Do you have any particular need that the website does't address yet? Is there a feature missing you'd find helpful?
No matter how big or small it is, let us know about it. Enter your Order other information in the fields below and click "Send". If you wish to include a message, type it in the Message field on the right.
We will contact you shortly. But, compared to the miseries of war, which have grown beyond all proportion with the introduction of modern weapons of death and destruction, they are trivial indeed.
Truly, it cannot be a question of humanizing war. The concept of the brief war and that of the humanization of its methods, propounded as they were on the eve of war in , led people to take the war less seriously than they should have.
They regarded it as a storm which was to clear the political air and as an event which was to end the arms race that was ruining nations. While some lightheartedly supported the war on account of the profits they expected to gain from it, others did so from a more noble motive: this war must be the war to end all wars.
Many a brave man set out for battle in the belief that he was fighting for a day when war would no longer exist.
In this conflict, just as in that of , these two concepts proved to be completely wrong. Slaughter and destruction continued year after year and were carried on in the most inhumane way.
In contrast to the war of 4. Since we now know what a terrible evil war is, we must spare no effort to prevent its recurrence.
To this reason must also be added an ethical one: In the course of the last two wars, we have been guilty of acts of inhumanity which make one shudder, and in any future war we would certainly be guilty of even worse.
This must not happen! Let us dare to face the situation. Man has become superman. He is a superman because he not only has at his disposal innate physical forces, but also commands, thanks to scientific and technological advances, the latent forces of nature which he can now put to his own use.
To kill at a distance, man used to rely solely on his own physical strength; he used it to bend the bow and to release the arrow.
The superman has progressed to the stage where, thanks to a device designed for the purpose, he can use the energy released by the combustion of a given combination of chemical products.
This enables him to employ a much more effective projectile and to propel it over far greater distances. However, the superman suffers from a fatal flaw.
He has failed to rise to the level of superhuman reason which should match that of his superhuman strength. He requires such reason to put this vast power to solely reasonable and useful ends and not to destructive and murderous ones.
Because he lacks it, the conquests of science and technology become a mortal danger to him rather than a blessing. In this context is it not significant that the first great scientific discovery, the harnessing of the force resulting from the combustion of gunpowder, was seen at first only as a means of killing at a distance?
The conquest of the air, thanks to the internal-combustion engine, marked a decisive advance for humanity. Yet men grasped at once the opportunity it offered to kill and destroy from the skies.
This invention underlined a fact which had hitherto been steadfastly denied: the more the superman gains in strength, the poorer he becomes. To avoid exposing himself completely to the destruction unleashed from the skies, he is obliged to seek refuge underground like a hunted animal.
At the same time he must resign himself to abetting the unprecedented destruction of cultural values.
A new stage was reached with the discovery and subsequent utilization of the vast forces liberated by the splitting of the atom.
After a time, it was found that the destructive potential of a bomb armed with such was incalculable, and that even large-scale tests could unleash catastrophes threatening the very existence of the human race.
Only now has the full horror of our position become obvious. No longer can we evade the question of the future of mankind. But the essential fact which we should acknowledge in our conscience, and which we should have acknowledged a long time ago, is that we are becoming inhuman to the extent that we become supermen.
We have learned to tolerate the facts of war: that men are killed en masse -some twenty million in the Second World War — that whole cities and their inhabitants are annihilated by the atomic bomb, that men are turned into living torches by incendiary bombs.
We learn of these things from the radio or newspapers and we judge them according to whether they signify success for the group of peoples to which we belong, or for our enemies.
When we do admit to ourselves that such acts are the results of inhuman conduct, our admission is accompanied by the thought that the very fact of war itself leaves us no option but to accept them.
In resigning ourselves to our fate without a struggle, we are guilty of inhumanity. What really matters is that we should all of us realize that we are guilty of inhumanity.
The horror of this realization should shake us out of our lethargy so that we can direct our hopes and our intentions to the coming of an era in which war will have no place.
This hope and this will can have but one aim: to attain, through a change in spirit, that superior reason which will dissuade us from misusing the power at our disposal.
The first to have the courage to advance purely ethical arguments against war and to stress the necessity for reason governed by an ethical will was the great humanist Erasmus of Rotterdam in his Querela pacis The Complaint of Peace which appeared in 5.
In this book he depicts Peace on stage seeking an audience. Erasmus found few adherents to his way of thinking. To expect the affirmation of an ethical necessity to point the way to peace was considered a utopian ideal.
Kant shared this opinion. This authority, he maintains, should be based entirely on the increasing respect which in time, and for purely practical motives, men will hold for the law as such.
Kant is unremitting in his insistence that the idea of a league of nations cannot be hoped for as the outcome of ethical argument, but only as the result of the perfecting of law.
He believes that this process of perfecting will come of itself. A plan for a league of nations having powers of arbitration was first formulated with some precision by Sully, the friend and minister of Henry IV.
Details zum Ablauf der Projekttage entnehmen Sie bitte dem Elternbrief. Liebe Eltern, unser Unterricht ist seit Wochen durch die Corona-Entwicklung, erkrankte Lehrkräfte oder Lehrkräfte, die in Quarantäne waren oder sind, beeinträchtigt.
Beispielsweise ist die ganze Klasse 10d zurzeit in Quarantäne. Der Mix aus Distanzunterricht und Präsenzunterricht gehört für uns alle zwar mittlerweile zum Alltag, bedeutet aber einen hohen Mehraufwand für das Kollegium an Vorbereitung und Zeit: ein Teil der Klasse wird im Präsenzunterricht beschult, und der andere Teil der Klasse wartet bei Moodle auf Aufgaben oder im Chat.
Die Distanzlernkoordinatoren unterstützen die Fachlehrer insbesondere bei der Betreuung der Schülerinnen und Schüler, die sich im Distanzunterricht befinden.
Zusätzlich sind die Koordinatoren für die Schülerschaft dienstags in der 5. Stunde mittels der zur Verfügung stehenden Kommunikationsmittel.
Trotz vieler Einschränkungen u. Unser Unterricht wurde weiterentwickelt und besteht nun aus einem Mix aus digitalem Unterricht und Präsenzunterricht.
Individualisiertes Lernen wurde dadurch auch auf einer Digitalen Lernplattform ermöglicht.